New puzzle..
New puzzle..
New puzzle..
New puzzle..
Tech, Hiking, Foto, MMA, Familie og jobb
Tech, Hiking, Foto, MMA, Familie og jobb
New puzzle..
Tech, Hiking, Foto, MMA, Familie og jobb
Partiuavhengig liste i Vindafjord kommune
NYE NETTSIDER ER UNDER UTARBEIDELSE
Vi bygger hytte!
Digital Markedsfører, innholdsprodusent, KAM og kommunikasjonsrådgiver
Aha!
I rant, therefore I am.
John Holme Blogg 
14
LikerLiker
Agree, 14
LikerLiker
OMG I wont, but I might be able.
LikerLiker
10
LikerLiker
Needs a second example to disambiguate; it currently requires guessing what the OP is thinking. I’ll giess that it’s the number of squares, so 14.
But for eg: it could be the number of vertices with 3 or more edges, which means the answer is 12.
LikerLiker
10
LikerLiker
Emlyn O’Regan interesting! For some reason my brain went to «number of intersections of at least 3 lines», which means the second puzzle would be 12.
LikerLiker
Jesus.
LikerLiker
Where are the method engineers – you goofs. If you Googled the solution then in your own words describe your deduction., please.
LikerLiker
14 kvadrater i figuren nederst. En stor, 9 små och sen 4 som består av 4 små. Men det är som några skriver bara en av lösningarna. Men den jag såg först så då svarar jag det.
LikerLiker
A woman after my own heart!
LikerLiker
don’t believe her people!
LikerLiker
I would go with 14, the number of squares you can form from the image. I do agree with the ambiguity of the puzzle here.
LikerLiker
14
LikerLiker
Is this square or what?
LikerLiker
yes 14.
LikerLiker
10
LikerLiker
Jesus, this is puzzling???????
LikerLiker
12 middle interceptions 🙂
LikerLiker
12
LikerLiker
Wrong OH
LikerLiker
12 😉
LikerLiker
10
LikerLiker
14
LikerLiker
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say 20.
LikerLiker
I am going to go out on a limb as well. I say wood. Through me off a bit, but very clever.
LikerLiker
14, 12 or 10 are all viable. You can’t decide a pattern based on only two samples.
LikerLiker
14
LikerLiker
If I’m right about the gist of it, 14.
LikerLiker
Lars Fosdal, how many squares can you find it is that simple, 1st example shows four squares set in an order where the is formed by the outer walls creating the 5th. So that suggest the answer will be the same only the more squares added the more you will find.
LikerLiker
I think we are all squares for solving it. So at least add one.
LikerLiker
#CirclesCounted: 0
😉
LikerLiker
9 little sqares inside, one big sqare around,one middle square .
So 11
LikerLiker
27. Number of rectangles larger than 1×1.
LikerLiker
1^2+2^2+3^2=14
LikerLiker
10
LikerLiker
Er 10 Jonh …..👍👍🙆🙆🙆🙆
LikerLiker
I love you all. Have i nice Day 🙂
hilsen Morten Eklund Gehrken. 🙂
LikerLiker
Jesus, draw us a picture!
LikerLiker
▲▲▲▲▼▶▶:-D♧◇○○○:-):-):-):-);-)☆☆☆☆★★★★
LikerLiker
Love u al
LikerLiker
14
LikerLiker
Emlyn O’Regan good one!
LikerLiker